Make your Cursor or Claude Code app production-ready
Coding agents let a small team write a lot of software quickly. We make sure it holds up – architecture, security, tests and a release process – so your AI-written codebase is safe to change, scale and sell.
What we check in a Cursor & Claude Code app
Part of every rescue audit. Each item is rated red, amber or green, with the fix and its cost.
- An architecture a new engineer can follow
- Security flaws common in AI-written code, such as injection and missing access checks
- Dependencies that are real, maintained and free of known vulnerabilities
- Secrets kept out of the repository and its history
- Tests that cover what matters, run on every change
- Error handling, logging and monitoring in production
- Database design, migrations and backups
- Rules for coding agents: what they may change and who reviews it
When a Cursor & Claude Code app needs more than another prompt
Nobody can explain the architecture
Each feature was built in a different style, and the code no longer fits together in anyone’s head – human or AI.
Security was never reviewed
In Veracode’s 2025 study of more than 100 AI models, about 45% of generated code samples introduced a security flaw.
Packages nobody chose
Agents added dependencies that are outdated, vulnerable or not what they appear to be.
Changes keep breaking things
There are few tests, so every agent session risks undoing someone else’s work.
Customers find the errors first
Problems surface through complaints rather than monitoring, and incidents take days to trace.
Investors or buyers are asking
Technical due diligence wants evidence the code is secure, maintainable and yours.
Audit, fix, then keep it healthy
- 01
Code audit
A fixed-price review of architecture, security, dependencies, tests and operations, with a red, amber, green report. Read-only repository access is enough.
- 02
Fix sprint
We close the security risks first, add tests and automated checks, and untangle the parts that slow you down.
- 03
Guardrails and care plan
Agent rules, review gates and monitoring so you keep shipping fast – with our engineers reviewing what the agents write, or a clean hand-over to your team.
Keep your coding agents
Coding agents are here to stay, and used well they are an advantage. We add the guardrails around them – repository rules, automated checks and human review on every change – so your team keeps the speed and loses the risk.
- An NDA from the first conversation
- You own the code and intellectual property
- Read-only access is enough for the audit
- A senior engineer leads your rescue
Frequently asked questions
Is AI-written code safe to put in production?
It can be, with the same discipline as any other code: review by an engineer, automated tests, dependency and security scanning, and monitoring. Studies show AI-generated code often contains security flaws when nobody reviews it; our audit finds and fixes them.
Do we have to stop using Cursor or Claude Code?
No. We help you use them more safely: clear rules for what agents may change, review gates, tests on every change and security scans in the pipeline. Our own engineers use AI coding agents the same way.
What access do you need?
Read-only access to your repository and hosting is enough for the audit. We sign an NDA from the first conversation, and you keep full ownership of the code and intellectual property at every stage.
What does it cost?
The audit is a fixed price agreed before we start. Fixes and ongoing support are quoted from the audit findings, so you know the cost before you commit to any work.